Every piece of software your business depends on can be looked at two ways: from the outside, the way an attacker, an auditor, or a customer sees it, and from the inside, the way the people who built it see it. TripleKey produces a grade for the outside view and a score for the inside view. Together, they make software risk legible to anyone in the C suite.
What the public internet, an enterprise procurement team, or a motivated attacker would discover about your software in the first sixty seconds of looking. Exposed credentials. Cookie weaknesses. Expired certificates. Files that should not be reachable. Misconfigurations that show up in the next vendor security questionnaire.
You do not need a credential, an agent, or an engineer to produce it. A domain name is enough. The output is a single letter grade, A through F, on the same scale a third party would calculate about you. It travels with you into every deal, audit, and renewal whether you ask for it or not.
The complete picture of what is running underneath the software you build, the software you sell, or the software you buy from a vendor. Every component, every dependency, every contributor, every known vulnerability, every license obligation. The work nobody on your executive team has ever been able to verify firsthand.
TripleScan reads the codebase every twenty four hours and produces one number on a zero to one hundred scale, with a ninety day trend. It is the answer when a regulator, an LP, a buyer, or a board member asks how healthy the software underneath the business actually is.
Most software risk reporting reads like a different language because it was written in one. Here is what each number actually means when it lands on your desk.
Software risk shows up differently in every role. The External Score and the TripleScan Score are designed so that each executive can pull the answer to the question they are accountable for, in the language they already use. One letter grade for the outside view. One number from zero to one hundred for the inside view. Pick your seat.
The grade you walk into every deal already knowing, before their security team scans you.
The headline number on the cyber slide of every quarterly board pack.
Board prep
Strategic deal forecasted
CEO interview on cyber
The customer, the board, and the underwriter each get an answer from the same daily dashboard. You stop maintaining three different versions of the security story.
What grade would a hostile journalist publish about us tomorrow, and what would the headline say?
The disclosure you never want to write.
The CEO who can already show a grade, a score, and a clean trend is the one who never has to.
A grade you drop into the cyber insurance application alongside the SOC 2 letter.
A single number that turns an abstract liability into a tracked, trending figure.
Cyber renewal
Audit committee
Engineering headcount ask
Technical debt stops being a conversation you cannot price. You get a quantified figure, a ninety day trend, and the evidence behind it, so you can see whether the liability on the books is compounding or being paid down.
If our cyber underwriter walked in today, what would change in their model based on our score, and what would it cost us?
One stalled deal pays for a year of TripleKey.
One stalled enterprise deal, one premium increase, or one regulatory finding. The math is not subtle.
A daily grade you read at a glance, the same way you read uptime or on time delivery.
A single number that holds engineering, security, and product to one shared measure of progress.
Weekly ops review
Monthly business review
Cross functional escalation
Software risk becomes a metric you check rather than a question you ask. The grade and the score sit alongside your other operational dashboards, refreshed daily, so cross functional teams work from the same picture instead of competing narratives.
Show me the three operational dashboards that influenced last week's decisions, and add the TripleKey scores as the fourth.
One number, every cross functional call.
Where to spend the next sprint, which vendor to renew, what to tell the customer. One trusted number replaces the debate about whose status is right.
A grade your team hands the buyer on day one, before their security questionnaire ever arrives.
A defensible number that answers the buyer's deepest diligence question without a call with engineering.
Forecast call
Stalled six figure QBR
Security questionnaire day
Your reps lead with a grade and a score instead of waiting two weeks for engineering to fill out a questionnaire. The security step moves from the back of the cycle to the front, and deals stop slipping quarters because of it.
How many deals over fifty thousand are stuck in security review right now, and what would unlock them this week?
Weeks back on every deal that hits security review.
The enterprise security review is one of the slowest gates in a B2B sales cycle. Answering it on day one pulls weeks out of every deal that hits it.
The grade you can put on the trust page and reference in PR without needing a privacy disclaimer underneath.
The defensible number the press, an analyst, or a buyer can reference when they push on the marketing story.
Crisis comms drill
Security adjacent launch
Analyst trust briefing
You get a public facing grade and a private facing score you can quote, embed, and date. Marketing becomes the first team to know when the trust story shifts, instead of the last.
If a competitor publishes a security incident note this week, what is on our trust page that lets us respond inside an hour?
Respond inside the news cycle, not after it.
The window between an industry headline and a competitor's response is measured in hours. Marketing teams with a live, evidenced trust position get that window. Everyone else writes apologies.
A grade per product, the same way you track NPS or activation, that you can compare side by side.
A score scoped to each codebase you own, so you can see which product line is dragging the whole portfolio down.
Forecast call
Stalled six figure QBR
Security questionnaire day
Each product gets its own grade and score, refreshed daily. You see which lines are healthy enough to accelerate, which need a sprint of remediation before the next release, and which should not be pitched to enterprise yet.
Of every product we sell, which one would I be least comfortable letting a Fortune 500 security team scan, and what is the plan to fix it?
Greenlight a launch with proof, not a gut call.
You walk into the launch review with a number, a trend, and the evidence to back the decision. The product gate stops being a guess.
A grade produced by a third party methodology, which a court or regulator can verify without taking our word for it.
Daily, timestamped scores plus full SBOM history. The proof that we knew what we knew and acted on it.
Forecast call
Stalled six figure QBR
Security questionnaire day
You replace narrative legal disclosures with a dated grade, a dated score, a ninety day trend, and an exportable SBOM history. Reasonable software risk management stops being a paragraph and starts being a record.
If we were served tomorrow on a software liability claim, what evidence would I produce to show we knew, and that we acted?
Evidence beats narrative, dated from your first scan.
Software liability is the next frontier of executive exposure. The companies with a dated record of measurement and action are the ones whose duty of care argument stands up.
The same outside in view the auditor will start with. You see it before they do, and you fix the gap before they note it.
A daily, timestamped record of software posture and remediation that turns audit prep from a project into a query.
SOC 2 / ISO 27001 cycle
Vendor risk assessment
Audit committee
Findings, evidence, owners, and dates live in one continuous record instead of a folder of screenshots taken the week the auditor arrives. You walk into every cycle ahead of the questions.
What three control gaps would surface in tomorrow's audit, and what evidence am I missing to close them today?
Weeks of prep, deleted from every audit cycle.
The enterprise security review is one of the slowest gates in a B2B sales cycle. Answering it on day one pulls weeks out of every deal that hits it.
The grade that captures the hardening sprints, cert hygiene, and exposure clean up your team has already done.
A ninety day trend you can attribute to the specific work your team prioritized, without translating CVE counts into adjectives.
Quarterly board pack
Headcount conversation
Sprint priority defense
Your reps lead with a grade and a score instead of waiting two weeks for engineering to fill out a questionnaire. The security step moves from the back of the cycle to the front, and deals stop slipping quarters because of it.
How many deals over fifty thousand are stuck in security review right now, and what would unlock them this week?
Score moved, headcount justified.
The score becomes the line item that justifies your security and reliability investment. Roadmap conversations stop being about adjectives and start being about points moved.
What the public, the press, and a hostile acquirer can independently verify.
The internal posture number with a defensible measurement methodology.
Quarterly meeting
Cyber audit committee
IPO / M&A diligence
One slide. One grade. One score. Ninety day trend. Top three risks retired, top three risks open. No jargon, no acronyms, no engineer required to interpret it. Pre formatted for committee minutes.
Show me the grade, the score, the trend, and the top three risks retired. Then show me the three still open.
A grade, a score, a trend, in the time it takes to read this.
The enterprise security review is one of the slowest gates in a B2B sales cycle. Answering it on day one pulls weeks out of every deal that hits it.
Software risk almost always shows up as someone else's question, asked at the worst possible time. Here are the five that land most often, and the answer TripleKey puts in your hands before you need it.
Software supply chain exposure has moved from an engineering footnote to a board level question in the last three years. The numbers below are why.
of codebases contain at least one high risk vulnerability today.
new CVEs published in 2025, the highest annual total ever recorded.
average days to identify and contain a software supply chain breach.
increase in supply chain attacks over the last two years.
You do not have to learn engineering to use either score. The setup is read only, the output is plain language, and the cadence is built around how executive calendars actually work.
The External Score runs from a URL alone, with no agent, no integration, and no engineering ticket. The TripleScan Score requires a single read only credential to the repository or repositories in scope.
Both numbers populate the executive dashboard within twenty four hours. Findings are categorized, severity ranked, and translated into one line plain language descriptions a non technical reader can act on.
Scores recompute every twenty four hours. The board view is generated automatically each quarter. Audit, underwriter, and customer exports are one click, formatted for the destination, and sharable without an engineer in the loop.
Chief Financial Officer
Healthcare software platform · Series C